1.) David O'reilly concentrates his paper on explaining the need for one to "think outside the box while using software "in ways it wasn't built to be used." Do you agree or disagree with his conclusion? If so, why?
2.)Does O'reilly's interpretation of what "style" is differ from your own interpretation of what you consider to be style? Do you agree with what he considers to be style and what he considers to be "surface style"?
No comments:
Post a Comment